Lawyer first. Systems architect second.
Independent advisory. Upstream to design, downstream to put things back on track.
From the Prosecutor's Office to prompt architectures.
Law studies in Brest, Master's in Justice, Trial and Procedures in Rennes, graduate diploma in Judicial Careers at Paris 1 Panthéon‑Sorbonne. CRFPA (bar school entrance exam) in criminal law, admissibility to the French Magistracy Contest. Twenty months at the Prosecutor's Office of Rennes, drafting indictments, appeal briefs and legal summaries alongside magistrates.
Since 2023, I design AI systems: prompt architectures, anti‑hallucination protocols, behavioural model evaluation, custom connectors for legal workflows and beyond. What I bring isn't the technical expertise of a software engineer. It's legal reasoning rigour, applied to a field that often lacks it.
France, South Korea, Brazil, Colombia.
Advisory. Architecture. Diagnosis.
AI, law, crisis communication are terrains. The craft is advisory.
- I. Advisory.Scoping a request, ruling out false good ideas, choosing the right tool. That's the core.
- II. Architecture.Designing a system before building it. Documenting every choice. Handing over the tool and its understanding.
- III. Diagnosis.Identifying the conceptual flaw in a tool that has turned against its user. Correcting, then explaining why it happened.
Towards a doctorate.
Advisory work funds the research. The medium‑term objective: a doctorate at the intersection of AI, law and cognitive sciences. Every project, every publication, every question builds the path.
Papers already out, tools published in the open, engagements resolved, all feed the same thread. Advisory isn't separate from research. It's its terrain.
A project to scope, a flaw to fix?
The first conversation lasts thirty minutes. No commitment.
Book a call